Many people argue that a fixed punishment may be more efficient than other punishments. Personally, I believe fixed punishment cannot resolve all problems. In this essay, I am going to outline the advantages and disadvantages of this suggestion.
First of all, crimes may vary greatly in severity and it can be unfair to compare a minor theft with a first-degree murder. If the fixed punishment works, there is a risk that a citizen who stole a bag of potatoes will be executed as if they were a murderer. Another disadvantage can be a lack of understanding of what the fixed punishment is. Some countries and even states may interpret this suggestion differently, which can result in chaos in the courts. Various punishments give judges an opportunity to treat criminals fairly, whereas the fixed punishment cannot provide such a right. Poorer people can also struggle in this situation, as without an experienced attorney they would not have an opportunity to defend themselves during a trial.
On the other hand, if the fixed punishment is introduced, the overall crime rate may decrease, as people may become afraid of the consequences. There also may not be a chance to be defended in the court, especially for serial killers and other serious criminals, because rules will be equal for everyone. If you commit a crime, you will face the consequences of your decision.
In conclusion, the fixed punishment has more disadvantages than advantages due to the possibility of being unfairly harsh to some people who violate the law, but still did not harm anyone or cause serious economic damage.