When the topic of hosting multinational sporting event is discussed. It has divided views. Supporters suggest that individuals have desire to host international sporting event in their own country; whereas, opponents counter-claim and state that worldwide sporting events provide many obstacles rather than advantages. Prior to my stance, both the sides would be discussed in the following paragraphs.
Discussing the former view, the foremost argument put forward by the supporters is that organizing an event in their nation brings many opportunities. Such as hosting sport events in large areas, they need several workers to manage the event and for transportation. So, it requires many vehicles. For example, if an event is occurring far away from the village, then for commuting to the event, the public needs vehicles; by this, drivers may earn some money. Also, in the stadium, several kinds of amenities are required so it’s possible for poor workers to earn some income. So, hosting sporting events in their country is beneficial for many workers as it helps to increase the country’s economy.
On the country, the proponents of the latter opinion advocate that hosting sporting events internationally brings a lot of detrimental effects, more than merits. They feel that the government must prioritise the things and focus on providing the basic accommodations rather than spending it on the unnecessary things. For instance, a man dying from hunger has nothing to do with the pastime. Sometimes it is seen that traffic is diverted due to this event and holiday is declared to avoid conservation on roads, which increases the hardships of a common man.
In conclusion, it has been observed that there are dual opinions on hosting international sporting events. In my opinion, hosting events in a supporter’s country may provide good labor works to workers, as a lot of facilities are required in events, and also for the management of such events, many people are needed. So, ultimately it increases a country’s economic status.