The question of whether to gain knowledge through brief contents, which is said to be preferred by youngsters, or lengthy texts continues to be a controversial topic when it comes to their success in learner’s academic development. There are valid opinions on both sides of this issue, which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, short educational contents usually accelerate the pace of learning. In fact, it saves a significant amount of time for students who are already bombarded with a variety of data sources. In addition, it is simpler to memorise the visual and audible information, which is mostly provided by online videos. For example, the portrayal of significant historical events are memorised easily rather than the theoretical explanation- which is usually complicated. That way, people can also share valuable knowledge with others, making the system more efficient.
On the other hand, one consideration is that seeking information from long texts individually enhances the students’ analytical thinking. The reason is that books enable readers to make assumptions about the things that will happen next or give solutions to the problems by themselves. Furthermore, books often provide detailed explanations of the problems whereas short contents generally mention only key issues in most cases. Another reason in favour of this idea is that some data may sometimes be distorted in online settings. This is because each content maker relies on their own contemplations of the concepts, which means that they may be interpreted differently by various publishers leading to viewers’ misunderstanding.
Overall, I feel that obtaining necessary information from books and long texts is a wiser course in comparison with getting it from short contents as the latter might hinder the students’ ability to think about the topics deeply. This is as long as the texts are not too lengthy that readers may lose interest in them.