The majorities of people embrace globalisation, however, some people argue that it is disadvantageous for them due to several reasons.
First of all, a globalised world leads to lose own tradition by introducing foreign cultures. For instance, Masai tribes in Sahara desert are known as their distinctive cultures like their languages, colourful clothes and extreme physical level. As for their capability, they could run as fast as leopards. Once, they had been lived in isolated society, which they only relied on limited nature in order to prey their meals by hunting. On the other hand, as a lot of reporters started to research their indigenous live, they were affected gradually to developed cultures like cameras, and TV. Nowadays, they used to post their innate tradition on social media by using smartphones. Moreover, they usually purchase their grocery in supermarkets. Now that, their purpose to advertise their innate cultures is just to earn enormous profits by attracting a wide range of people.
Furthermore, even if countries promote globalisation, it is not meaningful for all their nation. In particular, Japanese government set native English speakers in each middle school and high school to aim an improvement for student’s English. Whereas, if students try spontaneously to speak English to native teachers, they would enhance their motivation for English and trying out variety of English qualifications, seeking their points to improve by themselves. In this case, they are likely to engage in global companies and make over their language skills in the future. In contrast, students who do not have motivation, they cannot see any effect to adapt environment in English after a few years.
To summarise, globalisation is innovative to encourage cultural development and language engagement while this causes a danger to forget their characteristic customs and unmeaningful way for normal students.From these factors, I believe that globalisation is negative impact.