At present, museums and art galleries are regard as a basic culture landmark, while major of them have a work from abroad that illustrates other cultures’ history. Some people think that this is have benefits for both museums and audience, but others believe that there places should contain only native historical artifacts. I totally believe that wide range of arts is not harmful and museums and art galleries should have a works from different countries and contain different culture.
On the one hand, museums and art galleries are countries’ culture’s center. There places should contain local history, because travelers are the most frequent costumers who visit museums and art galleries. They are interested in the specific culture and this is a reason, why they are come to a country and visit the culture places. For example, according to the statistic in 2020 year, around 60% of the France’s museums visitors waited saw a history artifacts and native arts, but major of works were from other countries.
On the other hand, measure is should not be in the arts. Popular and famous art galleries and museums have a wide budget for expensive and valuable art’s artifacts. France’s museum that located in capital of state is the museums with the widest range of culture and art artifacts, such as painting from famous artists form whole world. This fact makes this museum so valuable and specific. Having big range from international artists is the success for each either art galleries or museums.
In conclusion, people have different views on the content of culture places. Some people think that meaning of this kind of places is a illustrate local history to travelers, while others think that is the huge benefit for culture places to have works from other states. In my point of view, museums and art galleries should have a wide assortment of artifacts