Brain drain has become crucial and highly debatable in this era worldwide. Some argue that this paves the way for better job opportunities while others argue that this hinders the economic growth and stability of a country. This essay will discuss both perspectives before drawing a conclusion that the host countries should take necessary steps to minimize the aftermath of this situation.
On the one hand, the skilled professionals and academics who migrate to the foreign lands get a wider range of better job opportunities. For example, Australia offers a wide range of opportunities for career prospects especially for the skilled migrants including doctors, with high wages including satisfactory standards of living conditions. Although they do not get the opportunities to settle at once, later they experience a quality living standards when compared with developing nations. Thence, it is apparent that this situation will be no longer a crisis as it serves as a boon in this aspect.
On the other hand, the migration of skilled workforce affects the economy of the home countries. For instance, the third world countries including Sri Lanka, Pakistan suffer a shortage of skilled labour time to time due to the migration of the educated people like teachers. As a consequence, the government’s and the responsible parties should hire or train them very often. As a result, this will largely contribute as a barrier to the economic stability of the home countries.
To conclude, it is apparent that both views regarding brain drain are highly demanding and debatable. However, in my view, if the host countries attempt to set rules and regulations with certain limitations and minimize the aftermath of this crucial issue, it will no longer be considered a crisis.