It is suggested by some that younger generations tend to interact less with their older individuals compared to the past. This essay will elaborate on key reasons behind this and suggest practical measurements.
On the one hand, there are several rationales behind this phenomenon. The older individuals hold traditional opinions compared to the younger ones. This is because a myriad of citizens who lived in the 20th century may have experienced economic fluctuations, civil wars, social stereotypes—the root causes of cognitive formation, this advertently formulates conservative views; they prioritise the traditional values. However, the younger generations tend to be more open-minded when they hold transformative views through a wide range of social norms, which makes them willing to shift social norms. These differences reveal a paradox between two generations. Therefore, with these clashing ideologies, it is hard for each group to relate to the other’s perspective, leading to less interaction compared to the past.
In order to tackle this problem, open dialogue acts as an incentive for each group to have an auspicious discussion. The younger can share their thoughts towards various social norms or issues as well as experience the seasoned individuals have through their lifer, which acts as a catalyst for connection between each group. However, the discrimination in social perspectives is inevitable so that individuals have to embrace these differences to reconcile their point of views. If implementation of this change happens, they will pave the way for the intergenerational connections, which breaks down stereotypes and builds understanding, thereby mitigating the generational gaps and communicating comfortably.
In conclusion, although the differences in point of views are the underlying rationale for the less communication of each group, it can be mitigated by embracing and respecting other’s opinions with an open dialogue organized.