People have different perspective and believe that it is good to share as much as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others advocate that some resources are too crucial or invaluable to shared freely. Let me examine this both views with the below paragraphs.
From my view, the sharing sources in sciences or business as much as possible were very incredible for populations who were in academy or employee, and it provided a numerous advantages such as a good sources for up-to-date in these field or they could bring the references to conduct the research activity and learning. Moreover, the providing of information to sciences research especially an article displayed a notable change in treatment to peptic ulcer patients, it showed significant changes to improve patient cares. For example, the previous guideline treatment in peptic ulcer patients was triple therapy but the new research evidences was updated to quadritherapy. Furthermore, It absolutely to giving the benefit to the society.
On the other hand, I also believe that some critical information is too valuable to shared freely. For one clear example in business, experts in one business company found the new methods in marketing, it was 5Ps marketing that update from 4Ps. So, they cannot provide it free in generally because these company spent a lot of money to investigate this methodology. Additionally, some resources that origin from scientific research were confidential such as formulation of product or medicine in pharmaceutical industries. To illustrates, pharmaceutical industries invested a numerous budget to determine to new formulation for their company, it was reasonable to share freely.
In summaries, both of this view is still debate over the last decades and there were not have the solution for both of population. From my opinion, to address this issues, it require the relevant partners such as governments or ministers have to solve this case.