Facing the more difficult lives and political issues, people have tended to believe that owing all of their money is a more effective way over paying tax to the state. Inspite of it, I totally discourage since there would be numerous drawbacks such as the imbalace community situations, social challenges would declipse advantages by aplying this new policy. This essay will demonstrate you of both positive and negative aspects.
To begin with, the more corruption, tax evation and excessive funds of government aren’t deniable. These have led to the suspicion and disbelieve in a nonequitable community. In addition, the weak financial control in some national governments have made various challenges and unintentionally grow poverty. For these mentioned factors, more and more authorities want to ensure their money, funds divided in several proper and accurate purposes. Without paying tax, people can address some financial difficulties and equitably invest in several infrastructure, landmarks, which make countries, local areas more attractive and develop tourism, economy….
However, we cannot dismiss any drawbacks it brings. In fact, there is no certain approvement that elders, homeless people, disabled people,… would access to sufficient and safe accomodation, fundamental services without national funds or money. The gap between richies and poverties would be bigger and bigger, leading to numerous social problems such as burglar, corruption, health problem, illiteracy,…. On the whole, the countries that adopt this policy would no longer develop in a well – balance way, hence more and more coups would happen alongside the mercurial politics .
On the whole, paying tax to state brings both merits and demerits, thus being more effective and less detrimental than choosing to keeping all of money for owns. These funds would erase social issues and ensure communial safety and property, promote national economy and enhance social living standards in a stable manner.