The proliferation of reviving old buildings has been a topic of concern. While there is a school of thought that restoring aged buildings requires enormous government intervention, especially in budgets, it is argued that it might be more suitable to allocate these funds to construct new ones. This essay will evaluate both aspects and describe the author’s opinion.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why numerous people advocate for building new accommodations. First and foremost, individuals can reap significant benefits from constructing new buildings. In fact, many urban areas fail to generate enough housing for their citizens, leading to unaffordable and rising accommodation costs. By subsidizing the housing industry through a social budget, the government can alleviate this housing shortage and make owning a house more accessible for ordinary people. Additionally, constructing numerous new accommodations plays an integral role in maintaining societal stability. Indeed, inadequate housing exacerbates homelessness and crime, acting as a precursor to an unstable society. To address this problem, the state can increase the housing supply and divert more funds to the construction of new buildings.
On the other hand, despite the aforementioned reasons, I am convinced that reusing and upgrading old buildings is of unshakable importance, ranging from saving resources to protecting the rights of residents. Despite their degradation, old buildings play a crucial role in conserving societal resources. These buildings have valuable foundations and prime locations. By reusing them, we save substantial resources and meet the public demand for accommodation more quickly than by constructing new ones. Moreover, recycling old buildings can maintain residents’ rights and minimize conflicts by avoiding the complete deconstruction of these buildings. This approach reduces unnecessary funds spent on relocating residents and secures their consent, resulting in a faster and smoother construction process compared to building new accommodations.
In conclusion, despite the significant benefits of constructing new houses for both society and individuals, I am in favor of updating ancient buildings due to their ability to save resources and maintain the rights of both citizens and authorities. While restoring old buildings in main cities involves considerable government expenditure, it can ultimately be more beneficial than spending this money on building new houses and roads. Overall, I agree that both new construction and restoration have their places, but I lean towards preserving the historical and practical value of old buildings.