The one group of people believes that the government and politicians should help artists such as musicians, painters and poets, whereas the other side thinks that this is just wasting money. I reason that the government should support artists, but money should be divided competently.
There are the many advantages when the government provides funds, the main reason and simple is that it can comeback money in two times or even more. For example, how statistic shows, the majority of recognised countries allocate finance for many artists and now they are in the top of various international events and as a consequence these countries have more money than they have invested.
On the other hand, to contribute and then earn funds the government should keep fairly and some individuals there shouldn’t steal them from the budget, because, in this case, it is unbeneficial. For instance, my country has the high percentage of corruption, so it would be the great way to make money for someone.
To sum up, both options have own nuances, but I tend to the first one more, because it is great, when beginner artists become famous, especially when these artists are from your country. I strongly believe that with each day the percentage of stealings and corruption activity will be decreasing and we will see more talented artists, because it is important for countries.