There is an ongoing debate over weather in many countries governmnet spend too much money on preaparing competitors to take part in major cmpetitions such as Olympic Games or football World cup. However other claim that it would be better to spend this money encouraging children to take up sports from a young age. I firmly belive that first children should be encoureged to playing sports from a young age and then spend a lot of money to preparing competiotrs to take part in major competitions.
Supporters argue that some countries spend too much money on preparing competitors to compit in such competitions such as Olympic Games or World cup. Government should spend money on this ocation becouse it can encourage many people from different countries while it help governemnt to have more income and stability. For example, in this year America reperesented by far the largest proportion of income and people among other countries because of football World Cup. The mojority of this world had been there, they spend too much money in flight, hotels and in world cup. As a result, if government spend to much money on preparing competitions, they can have more income from another side of the world and it help them to organize more games and increasing significanntly.
On the one hand, it is much helpful to spend these money on encouriging children to sports,and preapare them to big olympics.Thus many children addicted to their phones and it is a bit difficult to encourage them. However if government organize more effective and encouriging games they can play. For example, diving or outstanding games which can help them to encourage. Government create these games and it takes too much money so it is okey them too spend it for cxhildren because if they not be encouraged to natural games they may forget about olympics and it help them to keep ther games
To conclude, I believe that both argument are outstanding, because if