In the contemporary, some people believe that students should be made to focus on their specialised subjects while others argue that it is imperative for those learners to study a wider range. In this essay, I am going to discuss both views and give my own opinion later.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that specialising in topics unlocks many opportunities for students in the future, though it may come with lots of difficulties in return. This is because concentrating on their domain would allow them to master majors and enrich the knowledge related to that. Moreover, thanks to that, students are likely to acquire more chances to pass into their dream universities and colleges and later even a high-salaried job in prestigious companies. However, due to focusing on specific sectors, they may lack the basic foundation for others and even soft skills for daily life. For example, in Vietnam, students tend to show their clumsiness for practical scenarios, caused by their excessive concentration on theories.
On the other hand, comprehensive education can provide numerous advantages for students since it might cover a lot of categories containing the huge amount of general knowledge which sometimes cause pressure on individuals. Although opportunities offered by various sources could be beneficial to pupils,the pressure put into them would also rise significantly. For example, in developing nations, it is compulsory that students learn not only their own subjects but also other fields like language, culture, etc which could favour them to improve skills like communicating, persuading,… This could get them into a mental crisis since they may feel overwhelmed over the number of fields they learn.
To conclude, both opinions embrace their own pros and cons, which makes it hard to decide which is the better choice.