It is argued that employers think being able to communicate to others is more important than your level of education. Although there are some drawbacks to this way of view, the benefits outweigh disadvantages so I do agree with them.
To begin with, people with social skills convey ideas and thoughts more easily. Not only do they know how to simplify their speeches, they also understand human psychology. By keeping it simple and short, it is easier for the listeners to interpret what is being delivered. Secondly, having the ability to adjust to any social situations is a valuable skill that is a must for everybody. Hiring companies need individuals with flexible speaking and adaptation abilities. It is an essential skill for public relations. With this, employees are able to perform presentations and won’t hesitate to voice their opinions when something is wrong or missing. For example, university professors usually conduct lectures on a very broad scale of audiences with little to no nervousness or businessmen who travels across the globe meeting all kinds of people.
Though there are many advantages associated with social skills, there are also quite a few noteworthy negative aspects of this type of approach to hiring. Not having an adequate qualification means that employees won’t be up for the technical field of the task. What this means is that they might not be able to handle the maths and statistics. Some form of advanced calculation skills and logical thinking is needed in order to perform necessary requirements of certain positions. Qualified individuals with appropriate certificate or degree have more in-depth knowledge than the ones that don’t. Such as accounting, mathematicians or other science-related fields that are much more specialized.
In conclusion, I agree with employers preferring applicants with social skills to education levels. This method is not only is more beneficial but also help the companies cotinue to develop in the long-term.