Many argue that a healthy economy costs a country its environmental sustainability while others oppose this view. While current practices dictate compromising natural resources to sustain customer demands, positively reinforcing nationwide environmental regulations and investing in eco-friendly practices make the movement possible and more permanently sustainable. I firmly believe in initiatives for the latter where although outcomes reflect long term, the results maximizes agricultural gains and healthier consumers.
Today’s practices of capitalism works to supply people at an exponential rate, requiring efficient sources for manufacturing to meet demands. Because of increased priority to benefit off of revenues, manufacturers turn to low-cost sources, affecting the utilization of natural resources by favorability. A notable example is in the prevalence of plastics, where its accessibility can be seen filling the shelves with everyday essentials including water and shampoo bottles. Although there is a growing variability for natural options like shampoo bars or reusable metal containers, it remains niche and exclusive even with sufficient advertising as they go against lower rates and consumer-wide accessibility.
On the other hand, environmentally conscious practices can be seen as an investment. With initial efforts poured out to regulate natural alternatives and deter the use of artificial products, more opportunities open for farm produce and eco-friendly materials to become the sustainable and profitable choice for everyone. Without the option of availing plastic bags, profit turns to selling reusable cloth bags because of its incentivized practice with reward points, this subsequently keeps customers coming back to redeem shopping credits. Moreover, although leverages in government funding is substantial upfront, sustaining agricultural workers and their products helps to keep natural produce from the volatility of natural disasters and maintain healthier stocks within supermarkets available.
In conclusion, while the efficiency of artificial resources are profitable as they meet demands fast, advocating for natural-based products and practices that are safe for the environment can return revenue long term by maintaining a steady source of natural produce and the overall longevity of consumers to come.