While some argue that theoretical knowledge is more important in bringing people success, others believe that skills learned from hands-on experiences are more beneficial. I personally disagree with the view, as practical expertise are sometimes more applicable in work settings and making people stand out from the others.
Although fundamental theories are essential in building foundation of people’s knowledge, they often cannot be directly translated to real world situations. For instance, scientists are equipped with extensive biology and chemistry backgrounds to handle viruses. However, during their research, treatments for the organisms may not yield similar results as what they have learned from their textbooks. Due to this reason, many of them utilize other methods and skills through trials and errors to produce successful reactions. Through learning by doing, people can excel in their jobs and make progression in their career paths.
Additionally, many companies these days are more interested in hiring people with a plethora of skills to offer. A programmer who possesses not only remarkable coding skills but also marketing capabilities has a higher chance to get accepted in a pool of talents with similar education backgrounds. It is certainly more preferable for employers to recruit all-rounded workers, as human resources’ costs could be reduced.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the assertion that having strong academic backgrounds alone may lead people to success, as they should also be coupled with extensive list of skills necessary for individuals to adapt in their respective careers and to be used as their selling points in today’s competitive job markets.