Some people think that imposing prohibition for cars in the city center is the best way to increase air quality. While it can lead to the procrastination, I believe that conservation of ecosystem is more superior.
If the number of automobiles reduce noticeably, people may start being late to anywhere, such as works, study places and so on. The speed of public transport can’t make people arrive on time, moreover people may always miss them due to time schedule. The good example can be that if bus in UK is missed by mistake, it will take too much time to wait for another bus. Thus, citizens would rather use taxi or their own cars as fast transportation. However, I believe, keeping environment in safety would be more valuable than someone becoming quick.
The reason why reducing pollution is better is that it can be best way to improve overall well-being of humanity and biotic.Many diseases which were caused by pollution can be prevented through making percentage of automobiles decrease. As a result, there may be marked decline in lung diseases. For instance, the government of India has been banning cars from the city center to reduce contamination causing pulmonary illnesses. This demonstrates that not only the large number of vehicles can be damage to the environment, but also it can lead to the serious impact on human health.
In conclusion, while banning cars has both benefits and drawbacks, it is clear that I totally support advantages more. It is recommended that government must set limit on driving to save its own population.