It was thought by some that national leaders should distribute more revenues to preserve historical buildings. In contrast, others claim that finances should be allocated to other services. Although, spending money for protection of ancient objects is thought to be the one of the fundamental prioritize for government. I think that, distributing funds on facilities like hospital and education would be more efficient.
To protect the prehistorical objects as well as constructions, officials are building museums and laboratory. These projects cost a huge proportion of money however, the annual income from these buildings capable to cover all expenditure thus, national sectors are loosing money per year. For example, China, the one of the renowned country in the world, has the buildings which were constructed 4000 years ago. To preserve them, they spend for about 1. 7 billion dollars annually. But, without the help of our ancestors and their knowledge, nowadays humanity could not evolve, and we should be grateful to them.
Investing money on facilities like hospital, education and emergency services, national sectors not only will increase the well-being of their citizens but also enhance youngsters’ schooling. Moreover, if government hones the quality and quantity of facilities. The income from them will be higher. Furthermore, the infrastructure of some countries in Middle Asia needs to be reconstructed because, in the 1935 the middle Asia were fully occupied by USSR and after the crash of the greatest country the infrastructure which were build in USSR remained as it were. As an example, Uzbekistan struggles with traffic-jams and officials do not pay any attention to address this issue.
In conclusion, investing finances on preserving cultural values is less important than building and enhancing life- important facilities.