As environmental and air pollution are being raised, some individuals argue that governments should implement higher taxes for manufactories, while others reason that ordinary people and officials can cooperate and deal with the problem differently. In my opinion, it is a logical approach to raise the rates of taxes for productive companies. I will explore both viewpoints in the following paragraphs.
On one hand, authorities require a significant amount of budget to mitigate the industries’ toxic waste, and enact pragmatic programs to encourage people to conserve the ecosystem and take part in planting trees. Additionally, it is reasonable to collect a high amount of funds from productive companies, because they produce a large amount of contamination and damage the weather by using fossil fuels to power their machinery. Indeed, they are responsible for climate change and its impact on the public, and have to pay higher taxes to the government. Moreover, high tax payments mandate them to limit the use of fossil fuels and seek alternatives to be less harmful to the environment.
On the other hand, supporters of the opposite idea reason that there should be various approaches to cope with the ongoing issue. Firstly, public awareness of citizens is being enhanced about protecting the ecosystem and their environment, and completely inform them about their roles, responsibilities, and how their small actions could be helpful in this way. Additionally, through this approach, we can easily cope with the problem because all the residents of a community take part in solving it.
In conclusion, both viewpoints cited their knowledgeable reasons with their merits and drawbacks, but it is obvious that large productive companies have produced a considerable amount of dust in the air and have to engage in higher tax payment.