Some people think that media should be enable to make public personal life of politicians, beside others include I, believe that releasing Private details of people of politics in newspapers can be violate their privacy life.
Here are two points to consider on both sides of the argument:
To begin with, some argue that knowing about personal live of politicians can provide a better insight of their values, decision making processes. Understanding about a politician life can help public to figure out of their trustworthiness. Moreover large amounts of people have favor of digging into popular persons live. Potentiality of following paparazzi give people to observe their state-mans behavior specially if they are in election phase to seeing if there is any contrast in their ethic or not , even this can be cause of prevent corruption in government due to the fact that people are seeing their deed during serving to the people. It can take down or raise politician career life.
Alongside, another part of society says that publishers should not publicize every piece of information in their private life. It have negative affect on their family, work life and etc. In 1997 princess Diana and her boyfriend died in the car crash because they were chased by paparazzi car; it can tear a family apart.
In my opinion ,there is no necessity to finding out about everything. They are human like we are! Privacy is a important thing that every human-beings needs it .. I believe that spending much time to grasp others life can disturb us from other main problems or news around the country or even the world and it has no benefits to individuals.