With the prevalence of plastic pollution, some individuals claim that such issue can be solved by incentivising people to recycle their waste. However, some people contend that these measures are not significant enough, and governments should impose a blanket ban on single-use plastic products. I largely support the latter, believing that it is the most efficient and environmentaly profitable way to settle the matter.
First and foremost, restricting single-use plastic products, ranging from plastic bottles and bags to straws and vegetable packaging, is the opportunity not only to reduce the amount of pollution, but also to tackle the root of a whole problem. While other possible solutions provide a result that can be seen only in the future, such as encouragement to recycle products, a ban will affect immideately. For instance, the use of plastic bags will decrease considerably already in a first month of a legal forbidding.
Secondly, such restrictions towards companies’ plastic production are most likely to serve as a vital catalyst for innovations. Possible ban on using plastic will primary affect factories as their full production process will have to be re-established. Contemplating about the most suitable alternative, factories might end up with the brand-new material that will be reusable, biodegradable, cheap and convenient to work with. Indisputably, restrictions always have been a great incentive to make positive changes. Thus, enforcing businesses to replace plastic with something less harmful can accelerate the searches of a more environmenaly-friendly material.
In conclusion, I concur with the notion that authorities should forbid the production and the use of plastic products that cannot be resycled or reused as it is the best way to curb the amount of pollution.