In modern world, What people purchase products not knowing whether it is bad or good for their health. It is believed by some that producers should not be entitled to sell their products without certificate claiming that it is not harmful for individual’s health. I completely agree with this statement because of two reasons.
To begin with, Most people are of the opinion that having a good health is the most important thing because with bad health any citizen has limited options to do with life. If client chose a wrong product,it would cost him a health which is later would cause an absense in their work. However, this trend doesn’t only cause an individual’s problem with health, but also cause a reputational damage to producers. Today, technologies are developing along with the internet. Therefore, shoppers can chiefly vent their frustrations about a product in social media which can go viral. Hence, once others see the complaints , they stop to buy and even trust a company.
However, it should be noted that it has a drawback. One major disadvantage is that it can be tedious and pricey. Companies have to accept people who check meat, drinks, and other products which they have to finance to operate this operations. Moreover, signing documents would take much time ,but if a company want a great demand, it worth doing it.
In conclusion, i totally agree with this idea that shops should not be entitled to sell any of their product without a particular certificate claiming that it is not bad for health. I base this view on two main arguments: harmful for health and reputational damage to companies despite one drawback that it is tedious and expensive.