There is an ongoing debate regarding whether sports play a fundamental role for the lives of schoolchildren. Some people believe that sports should become part of the core curriculum to support young learners in their school life. However, others argue that it should be an optional course. Before presenting my opinion, both views will be discussed further.
Examining the former opinion, the primary argument of the supporters put forward is that sports embody a significant value. This is because sports teach students to be supportive regardless of the outcomes. In addition, they also believe that sports positively influence their mental health. When they engage in sports activities, their bodies release endorphins and dopamine, which significantly enhance their sense of happiness and well-being.
On the contrary, those in favor of the latter opinion have their own arguments. To begin with, they argue that not every student is enthusiastic about participating in sports. Some students prefer music, art, or even drama activities. Moreover, it is important to note that only a limited number of schools offer full sports facilities and activities. Generally speaking, it is a fact that only boarding and private schools provide a wide range of sports. For instance, swimming pool facilities only can be found in those schools as parents invest their great amounts of money to pay those facilities.
Overall, I feel that sports should be compulsory for schoolchildren, because it positively affects their mental health and character development. This should be accompanied by schools providing a wide range of sports options, allowing the students to choose activities that interest them.
