he question of whether government should provide free healthcare to all citizens or individuals should be responsible for their own healthcare costs has sparked considerable discussion. Many people hold the view that this kind of government spending creates a tax burden for taxpayers, but others think otherwise. In my opinion, while there are benefits to wide range of society like disabled citizens or elderly people, there are also significant drawbacks such as economic issues.
First and foremost, it is important to note that the government has responsibilities to its citizens for example the public safety should be ensured, diseases should be prevented, and there should be good quality education. Likewise, healtcare is a significant duty for the governments. All citizens have their rights since they are the ones who pay taxes and have obligations. Therefore, many people advocate that free health care should be a basic right. One of the most significant benefits of free healthcare is the sense of security.
While this may be true to some extent, I believe that there should be budget constraints to afford the health expenses to provide tax justice. Recent studies show that fiscal and financial burden of free access to healthcare services cost billions of dollars. Consequently, in my opinion, while there are benefits to disadvantaged people, there are also significant drawbacks to people who pay a significant amount of tax.
In conclusion, it is clear that while both arguments have their merit, free healthcare system can damage the economy. Therefore, I believe that steps should be taken to prevent the idea of injustice between the people who can afford a large amount of tax and who pay a smaller portion of taxes.