In recent days, implementing artworks in urban areas has become increasingly popular. Most people state that the government must allocate more funds to implement artwork such as paintings and statues in cities, which makes them exceptional places to live in. This essay will argue why it is completely preposterous to execute statues and paintings in metropolitan areas.
First of all, the public believes that the administration should assign more money to implement art in urban, which makes them improved place to live in.By doing so, the cities would look stunning and encourage more innovation in artworks. Besides, it would create job opportunities for various craft workers.As an example, cities which have more craft works boost economies by attracting more tourists to visit.However, there are many problems in other sectors, so the government should allocate funds to those issues.
Secondly,there are many issues in various sectors requiring funding in metropolitan areas. So the government should give priority to those problems by funding them sufficiently. Apart from artwork, health care services, transport facilities, and housing need development, so the government should spend more money in these sectors. Hence, this development makes the cities better place to live a comfortable life. For instance, India has become third-largest economy in the world because it spent high budget on health care sectors.Therefore, instead of spending more resources on handicraft works, it can allocate funds to different fields.
In conclusion, allocating more budget to artworks can benefit certain areas. However, the government should give importance to other fields, which make a metropolis a better place to live in.In my perspective, it is entirely unnecessary to spend the budget on artworks; instead, it can invest in other areas.