Crime is regarded as a common unlawful act where existing systems and laws imposes a level of punishment. Indeed, the increase of violence and heightened aggression can impact civility in our cohesive society. This essay will examine the potential repercussion of implementing equal penalisation to any crime and argue how the basic foundations of human rights should play a role in determining an individual’s crime.
The concept of crime is always considered an unacceptable behaviour in our society. However, I believe every individual deserves to be given the benefit of the doubt if there is no reasonable ground or evidence before concluding a judgement. For example, an offenders level of involvement and potential rehabilitation must be recognised. For this reason, understanding and fostering the idea of fairness within the justice system is an important factor to determine an appropriate punishment.
Whereas, those who advocate for fixed punishments ensures a straightforward process and a clear message to offenders. For instance, in some jurisdictions, certain offences such as drug trafficking or murder must carry mandatory minimum sentences, aiming to deter individuals from engaging in such criminal activities. However, it fails to recognise the complexity and circumstance of the crime. In particular, an individual committing theft to support for their family deserved to sentenced with a different warranty compared to someone who steals out of greed.
In my opinion,