In contemporary society, testing new drugs in animals has emerged as an effective way in the pharmaceutical industry. While some maintain that it is not benevolent to measure the safety of medicines on animals, opponents believe that is a medical necessity. This essay will explore the arguments of both views, as well as provide reasons for my support of the latter opinion.
There are clear arguments against animal experimentation, which are a sense of unethical and distinctive accommodation. In terms of morality, the test carried on creatures could subject them to trauma and pain. As new medicines have not been analysed in living organisms, they could exert many negative impacts on animals’ health, such as spasm or anaphylactic shock, which increase the risk of mortality. Moreover, the use of animals in experiments is not a sufficient method because of the difference in habitats. Animals, which do not suffer from wide-ranging factors like economic pressure as well as deeply-rooted psychological issues, can not demonstrate the same experience of people in these medical treatments. For example, animals could not get Parkinson’s disease since they are not in the conditions demanding for a strictly attentive brain as humans, so they can not reflect the comprehensive medical effect curing that disease.
It is factual that checking medical safety on living creatures is of great benefit to humans because of the contribution to life-saving cures by its cell structure and short life cycle. First, the quiet similarity in structure between animals and humans has made a contribution to many medical breakthroughs. As several animals bear a close resemblance to people in cell formation, which enables them to indicate the same reaction as humans, they could give signals to warn about the risk of these medicines. Consequently, animals can help professors research and produce the most feasible drug. Regarding the short life cycle, animals have a more shortly speedy reproduction that helps researchers easily to comprehend the whole life under medical effect. For example, mice are used in many laboratories to test products before human use as they not only have immediate cell structure like people but they also have short lifespans that could give scientists a clear observation about risk and result.
In conclusion, although many critics believe that animals need to merit more human treatment, I strongly think animal testing is still an essential method because of the medical enhancement and short lifespan.