The school of thought holds that take experiments firstly in animals with the propose of test safety of human beings is really illegal and strict, while the opposite stance asserts that it is a crucial way of medicine.From my perspective, it is necessary to attach importance to both of them.
On the one hand, proponents of the first viewpoint have several reasons to justify their position. They argue that the amount of tests for fauna firstly give them pain and suffering that in this turn animals have fear of people. In other words, process puts distance as well as attitude more far between animals and humans. Therefore, there can be a likelihood of their attacking just with the propose of protect themselves before catching. In addition, even exist any drugs that are literally should not be in wildlife’s blood wich is significantly detrimental for their overall health. Hence , it can be led to the nature problems. For example, the extinction of some particular type of animals. So this trend is adviced to keep nature creatures and use alternative methods to check the safety of human medicines.
On the other hand, other people assert that animals are medical necessity. They believe that testing animals gives us a lot of 99 % guarantees to make sure that drug is hazardous for well being or not. This is because animals have simultaneous any immune systems with people. As a result this type of experiments help scientists with saving population in good conditions plus it is brilliant idea to develop field of science.
In conclusion, in my opinion despite many positive impacts on humans, nevertheless I support the first statement.