Many people argue that zoos, where animals are kept in artificial enclosures, should be banned in this century. This essay fully supports this statement because it is cruel to confine animals to small spaces, and nature programs allow us to observe these creatures without the need for a zoo.
The first reason animals should not be kept in artificial enclosures is that it is inherently cruel. As human beings, we are intelligent enough to recognize that these animals are suffering. If we choose to keep them in confinement despite this knowledge, we are inflicting unnecessary pain and discomfort. For instance, SeaWorld in California recently admitted that their whales were depressed and not in optimal health because they cannot swim in the ocean. Yet, they decided to keep them in the park because they are a significant attraction.
Another reason is that high-quality documentaries have eliminated our need to see animals in captivity. With the advancement of television technology, we can now enjoy intimate glimpses of wildlife in their natural habitats. This allows us to gain a deeper understanding of wild animals from the comfort of our homes. For example, the BBC recently produced a series called ‘Life in the Undergrowth’ that offered stunning high-definition insights into the lives of insects.
In conclusion, wild animals should live freely because they do not belong in captivity, which causes them pain and discomfort. In this technology-driven world, there is no necessity to venture out to learn about animals, as we can easily do so by watching informative programs at home. This is convenient for both people and animals.