Young generation is thought to be controlled how their free hours spent, while others think that child decision of children ought to be made independently. While some people argue that parental control should be strict, others believe that child autonomy is noticeably better. This essay will discuss both perspectives before explaining why I believe that regulating children through authoritative rules clearly outweigh freedom of young people.
On the one hand, critics claim that allowing children to choose their own activities fosters intrinsic motivation. They argue that personal interest of children has a special impact that can help to cope with boredom and never give up in developmental period. Self-Determination Theory, for instance, it is a clear predictor of life-time success and promotes cognitive abilities. From this perspectiv uncontrolled leisure activities demonstrate higher level of creativity and sustained engagement.
On the other hand, supporters of managing how children use their free hours contend that management schemes may reduce harmful behaviours and addictions. Especially, limiting screen time and motivating children to physical activities, such as sports will be beneficial. A clear illustration of short attention span and academic performance are able to be strongly enhanced while by restrictions which are harsh by parents. Therefore, strict rules can directly support attention span and academic performance.
In my opinion, although the negative effects of directing children should not be ignored, they are often exaggerated and can be effectively controlled. It is sometimes argued that children may feel pressure and lose creativity. However, this view overlooks the fact that guidance does not mean total restriction, but safe barriers that protect children from wasting time on unproductive activities. Moreover, parents can set rules with limited choices, such as letting children pick between reading, sport, or a hobby, which is able to build independence. For these reasons, I firmly believe that parental regulation is the better effort.
In conclusion, while some people consider total freedom for children will be beneficial, others regard parental control is more effective. I strongly support the latter view, as the benefits of managing free time of young generation far outweigh its potential harmful effects when clear limits that provides both freedom and protection
