Most of people argue that the internet may fully replace the source of reading news and significant information through newspapers and magazines. I disagree with this statement because as everyone has access to the internet there may be a chance of misusing the data and some people prefer modern to old methods.
Not everyone in the world use the internet wisely, some people misuse it wantedly. Some organizations hire people to publish false information about the politicians and celebrities who are against them. Furthermore, the citizens who are reading the articles are not cross-checking whether the information is true or false. To illustrate, last year a celebrity went far for suicide as the article writers wrote wrong about her relationship which led to her breaking up with her partner.
Our parents and grandparents prefer reading the important news in the paper as some people don’t know how to access the Internet. Not only the satisfaction level of holding the book with our hand while reading but also sometimes our eyes might be affected by the blue rays caused by the phone screen. Moreover, children are sticking to their phones for every single thing, if this method is implemented then their eyes would be effected because of the screen time. For example, the research suggested that children are getting their eyesight increased by 10 percent every year.
In conclusion, organizations publishing the news and magazines should stick to their old methods rather than equipping the new methods by using the internet. Thus, there might be strong data leaks of the information of the people which may affect their lives and would be no privacy for them in the future. Also reading through the news on the internet leads to spending more time and effecting the eyes and brain.