More and more think that the crucial demand for a modern urban area is an effective public transport system, while others argue other requirements need to improve urban areas. In my front of view on balance, the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
On the one hand, public transport system contribute to the city’s order. Many individuals use—buses, metros, and other vehicles—as a result, the air is softer, and people damaged fewer from air. Hence, many countries suffer from cars’ carbon dioxide and people injure from various ills. For instance, In Afghanistan, cities are very complex and untidy; there is no public transport system. So, there experience many accidents. The country has not developed yet. Albeit, it has an effective transport system contributing to cities’ modernization–New York, Berlin, and Tokyo–a peak of improving there. If other countries pay attention to public transport system, it will assist in urbanization and urban layout.
On the one hand, many cities have various requirements especially, ecology, and people’s culture. Many professors showed that one of the curtail factor that environment. As much as, the city improving, unless the environment is worst, this situation influence city’s urbanization. But also, the government should plant trees. Consequence, the city’s air will be soft. With regards, cities evolving contributed by people. For example, people give rubbish to streets and other sites. If this situation continues, it will bring the city’s image bad. If people do not give rubbish streets, the city becomes clean. Urban areas developing contribute everyone.
To sum up, some people say that the most important requirement of a modern city is an effective public transport system, while others believe that there are other important requirements for a city. I believe that city modernization does not comprise public transport system and I think other requirements will be beneficial.