The polarizing nature of urbanization- whether city planners focus heavily on housing for residents or creating more green space – has sparked heated discussions. In this regard, many people may argue that housing is an integral part of humanity, while others contradict with the idea of making cities more pollution-free by creating greenspaces. I strongly believe that accommodation and greenspaces alike play a crucial role in shaping both economy of a nation and overall well-being of people.
On the one hand, for those who assert that city planners should rely excessively on constructing more houses, one of the key beliefs is that this concept not only provides housing and commercial spaces for general residents, but also the nations’ whole economy can be intensified, as these houses can attract more and more people from around the world. However, people should not disregard the idea of excessive amount of housing can ultimately have negative impact on the society as a whole. This is chiefly because when housing expands, it can degrade the air quality through an increase in cars, factories, and power plants.
On the other hand, there is the perception of some parties is that increasing more greenspaces rather than focusing more on housing creation has a few advantages that can have effects on the society positively. The more buildings in a city, the more hazardous air pollution would be. Consequently, air-pollution can lead to the onset of some chronic diseases such as asthma, stroke, or even death. One of the common things in dense cities is that individuals, especially elderlies, can witness long-term drawbacks by having difficulties with breathing in the drought and dangerous air quality. However, it can be solved by concentrating on more green spaces, especially planting trees, as they can address this ever-evolving problem of pollution by reducing particulate matters in the air, making it easy to inhale.
In my opinion, while both approaches have their own merits and drawbacks, I firmly believe that integrated method should be implemented, meaning there should be a balance between each other. The creation of green places can lead to well-being of residents, whereas more housing can empower the economic flaw. Accommodation and greenspaces alike should take into consideration to ensure the overall development of a nation.
In conclusion, although the rise in housing facilities can result in strong economy and green places can lead to pollution-free environment, I completely believe that city planners should consider both comprehensively, as they support one another in urban development.