Budget allocation to preserve minor languages has sparked considerable debate in recent years. Some people believe that a considerate amount of money should be dedicated to conserve minor languages, however others argue that investing in language preservation is a waste of public financial resources. In my opinion, language is not only a way of communication but represents the history and culture of the human civilisation.
First and foremost, the society is evolving and so are it’s priorities. Presently, some of the biggest concerns humans face are global warming and poverty, which requires more attention than safeguarding a language. The government’s budget is limited and it becomes crucial that this money is invested on the things that matters more for a sustainable future. For instance, saving deterioting environment must be priortized over the fear to loose a language since natural resources are the lifeline for human survival.
Conversely, language is something that links the present with the past and acts as an example of how human civilisation has developed over the years. A community’s mother-tongue is like a tracker to it’s history and social values which are irreplacable and once lost cannot be retrieved as their importance remains unmatched. For example, tribal people residing in the deep forests have lost most of their natural surroundings to industrialisation and the only identity of them remaining is their language which they cannot afford to loose.
In conclusion, although the governement has limited finances the fact that minor lanaguages once vanished cannot be revived poses as a matter of serious concern.