Some people believe that governments should spend public money on encouraging a good level of health in consideration to restrict diseases rather than to expend it on the medication for sick people. I somewhat concur with this opinion. To explain my position, I am going to present the advantages and the disadvantages.
On one hand, there are two main points. First, prevention is always better than cure, so investing for public money on promoting healthy style is the best way. This is illustrated by the fact that better lifestyle will certainly impact in decreasing the number of sick persons, and as a result, it will drop the need for state budget for funding the medical cost. Second, we can save money for medicine because healthy care programs do not need money as much as funding cure of societies require. For example, governments educate people through the advertisement to encourage cook at home and the diet includes more fresh vegetables.
On the other hand, there are two key points. First, public budget of government can help people to pay expensive cost for medicine, especially for people with a low income. For example, hospitals are more expensive because of good treatment facilities and good doctor. may be supported by creating programs like health insurance subsidies.
In conclusion, because of advantages and disadvantages, I am convinced that using public budget on promoting both a healthy lifestyle and treatment ill are important.