In assessing a country’s progress, some assert that economy is the primary contributor and yardstick; while the opposition believes in the equal significance of other numerous circumstances. Personally, this essay adheres to the point of view that it is not reasonable to define an area’s success by only one factor and disclose equivalent fundamental elements for a country’s long-term flourishing future.
Undoubtedly, strong economic position is an indigenous cornerstone of a nation’s advancements. Robust and established economy ensures employment, enhances living conditions, and increases the equality of living. However, I suppose that other factors such as appropriate schooling, accountable medical services, and governmental social support are irrefutably vital, since we pretend to be living in a democratic and tolerant world where the welfare of the country’s citizens defines its prosperous evolution in tolerance, consciousness, and conscience of the government. A first-rate example appears to be the disintegrated in the 1991 Soviet Union. It was a global power with, on the surface, leading economic status and population’s well-being; however, looking further into the internal ex-communistic system, the main participants to its inevitable downfall were poor living conditions, practically impossible accessibility to basic needs, and vehement limitation of spiritual enlightenment
Furthermore, economic prosperity, education, healthcare, and environmental sustainability play a pivotal role in a country’s progress. It’s erroneous to prioritize one over the other as they are interconnected and mutually reinforcing.
To conclude, although economy is universally acknowledged as an incomparably significant for a nation’s progressive evolution element, total absence of diverse socioeconomic multipliers can lead to an irrevocable drawback of a global economic empire.