It is a controversial topic that governments should allocate money to public services rather than arts, including music and theatre. I firmly agree with this opinion, as public services are more essential for human life.
On the one hand, spending money on the arts enables a country’s culture to introduce to other nations, thus increasing tourist attraction. This advantage brings about rising the country’s economic prosperity. For instance, raising a star globally well-known allows many foreign people to know the nation and to come this country for this singer’s concert. Ultimately, they can introduce this country and can want to visit again. This benefit can improve both the nation’s image and financial stability.
On the other hand, public services, particularly health and education, play vital roles in life quality and expectancy of the nation’s citizens. Another words, investigating on these public services not only improves citizen’s physical and psychological well-being but also increases the number of qualified individuals. Thereby, the country can develop both economic and social meanings. People living in countries where have quality public services tend to more interest with art work. It is a good example of this situation that many developed countries, like the USA, have many globally popular artists in both theatre and music.
In conclusion, although investigating on arts is very significant for a country’s popularity, I totally believe that allocating money on public services are more significant for many reasons mentioned above. It is an undeniable fact that if a nation lacks of essential public services, they cannot afford to raise important artists.