To agree or disagree with the statement that government should point out public services mainly, despite causing one of the basic parts of a nation to cease to exist, is an important issue. Putting the discussion in a wider context, ignoring art and its other routes has always been debatable. Even though some people think that civic services should be the country’s major side of investing money, I wholeheartedly believe that art must also be the main part of government investment. Firstly, I will discuss some arguments supporting my ideas about this statement, after which some arguments against that will be presented.
On the one hand, many people agree with this statement for many noteworthy reasons. The most important thing is that a government usually seeks the sufficient and significant impacts of public services for encouraging citizens and developing their countries faster. Therefore, these services include healthcare, education, and infrastructure, which are essential for survival. One more reason to agree with this statement is the limited budget, which means governments must prioritize life-saving and practical services. Investing in medical knowledge and equipment, new businesses, and teaching intelligent candidates should absolutely be more beneficial.
On the other hand, art is the most basic and meaningful part of life and history. The most remarkable thing is that, without painting, people cannot imagine the world—such as historical movements, the appearance of ancient people, and even today’s contemporary technological world. This is because every element of the world, in a modern sense—design—is associated with imagination, and we can express our visions only through art, painting, and unique music. Another key reason is that art serves as one of the vital economic engines by engaging tourism in some countries, including Florence, Rome, and Venice. Culture and creativity drive innovation, tourism, employment, and global brand identity.
All in all, when all the specific reasons and relevant examples are considered and evaluated. I strongly disagree with the idea supporting this statement because its drawbacks outweigh its benefits.