In recent years, investing has become an increasingly contentious issue in contemporary society. While some individuals argue that governments should invest more in protecting wildlife, others maintain that human needs should come first. This essay will examine the key aspects of this issue before presenting my perspective.
To begin with, one of the most compelling arguments in favor of conservationists is always protecting animals from harmful activities. This is mainly because some individuals try to harm animals, so conservationists have to take protective measures. Furthermore, the government should get involved and invest money for such protection, which can contribute significantly to animal and wildlife protection. A clear example of this can be seen when conservationists put up dangerous electric fences to protect farmers and their crops where elephants try to destroy them. Consequently, it is evident that the government should invest more in protecting wildlife.
On the other hand, it is equally important to acknowledge that some people think that human needs should come first when it comes to investment. One significant concern is that people have financial problems just to survive. This is mainly because of the rising prices of food, in particular. Several people do not have permanent jobs; they work day-to-day or for daily wages. Moreover, because they don’t have a stable job, they can’t afford the rising prices of food, further exacerbating the situation. For instance, the prices of food are revised daily by the government. Therefore, these factors should not be overlooked when considering the broader implications that the government should consider the needs of the people.
In conclusion, although looking after human needs may present certain challenges, I firmly believe that the government should invest in both wildlife and human needs. Ultimately, a balanced approach that takes into account both wildlife and human needs would be the most effective way forward.