There is an ongoing debate over whether organizing international sports events benefits the country. While some people argue that such events harm the environment and threaten cultural values, I firmly believe that its advantages, particularly in terms of economic development and greater cultural exchange.
Opponents point to the environmental and cultural risks associated with such events. One key concern is environmental degradation. Massive events are likely to attract a significant number of tourists to the host country, which might lead to increased levels of litter, noise, and pollution, especially when visitors do not follow environmental regulations. Another important concern/notion related to cultural values. Although many tourists learn about the country’s history and cultural customs before visiting, some may not be aware of it and might inadvertently offend cultural customs and dismiss cultural sensitivities. This, then, may result in social tension and disrupt community harmony.
Plausible as these worries are, others, including myself, believe that the benefits hold more weight. One primary benefit is economic growth. When a country hosts global sports events, it brings an influx of tourists into the country who spend money on a variety of things, including but not limited to food, accommodation, and entertainment. As a result, local businesses can thrive thanks to increased consumer spending and it might even result in the creation of job opportunities for residents. Just as important, such events can increase cultural awareness. As tourists attend traditional activities and customs, they are likely to strike up conversations with locals about a wide range of topics, ultimately improving intercultural communication.
In conclusion, although critics argue that global events pose serious threats to the environment and cultural values, I am of the view that these are overshadowed by its benefits, such as economic growth and intercultural communication.