Some people believed that private vehicles ought to be prohibited in central cities, enabling them to face with traffic congestion, while others claim the incompetence of this solution. Although banning personally owned motorcycles contributes to minimize the number of transport commuting on the terrains, from my perspective, this implementation are not able to solve the mobility problems of the dwellers.
It is understandable that numerous individuals are keeping the view that privately owned transport should be unacceptable. Because they think of this form of vehicles is considered as a predominantly factor of the congestion problems. Without the clogging of personal cars on the streets, public transport, cyclists, and pedestrians can have more space to move easily, resulting in smoother traffic pace. Due to the fact that, majority of mega cities in the developed countries have made an issuance of a ban on travel by private motorcycles due to they typically cause traffic jams, leading to discomfort and inconvenient of commuters.
Nevertheless, other people still keep a more skeptical view of the utility of this solution. If private vehicles are banned, it might limit mobility for particular groups. Especially in some workers who have to commute constantly between workplace and home, the elderly, disabled individuals, public transport may be not always an effective way to travel. For example, rural areas without advanced infrastructure have a limited accessibility to ride on metro or underground, it can be linked to an impact on traveling or working of inhabitants.
In conclusion, although prohibiting privately owned vehicles helps to create a great condition to prevent traffic congestion, I believe that the downsides of this solution are limiting the mobility of citizens, and causing the inconvenience.