The debate about the measure to eliminate criminal acts has been discussed over time. Some people believe that put criminals in the jail for a much longer time can significantly reduce criminal behaviors, while others argue that there have other solutions to cut down the crime rate. The essay will examine both perspectives before drawing the conclusion.
One major benefit of giving longer prison sentences to criminals is to reeducate them. This is because jails not only have the function to put individuals who do illegal things in, but also play the role as school that teach criminals to be a qualified people after being released. For example, criminals need to learn laws so that they will know what can and can not do. Vocational skills are another lessons that criminals being taught in the prison in order to do for livings. However, it has a notable disadvantage which may lead jail into no room if the criminal rate do not being effected by the longer prison sentences since its not threaten enough. This highlights the dark side of the propose.
From my perspective, addressing the root causes of crime may be an effective measure to mitigate the crime issue. This is because people do illegal things has their own suffering and there are plenty of research that show the relationship between crime rate and society issue. So the government should take actions in improving education and job opportunities. Equipping citizens with common sense and decent work will largely reduce the amount of crime and bringing a more peaceful and safer society to residents.
In conclusion, while some believe that longer prison sentences are the most effective way to combat crime, I argue that tackling its underlying causes is a more sustainable solution. By investing in education, employment, and rehabilitation programs, societies can achieve a more meaningful and lasting reduction in crime rates.