Nowadays, some people believe that the government ought to invest in health and do fruits more affordable, while others claim that the government need include tax unhealthy food. Both ideas relevant for this issue, because sales about fruits give more motivation for eat only healthy foods, while tax give same result.
On the one hand, if healthy foods become more affordable, some people will motivated about diets and adopt a healthy lifestyle, also for those, who already follow this lifestyle this is become beneficial.Many people, special family with small income will buy fruits more than others products because fruits become cheaper and beneficial for buying.
On the other hand, there are people who can not eat sweet foods or does not like and for them tax is sensible decision, because they are not eat fruits and variety about subsidies may not suit them. So, with tax unhealthy foods like chips, drinks with high sugar or fastfood become unnecessary for buying and sales will decrease.
In my opinion, first variety about subsidies more appropriate and useful for many people, because tax sounds rather negative and it can make resonance in society. Offers looks like free, so if the government be concerned about health, it will adopt the first decision about make healthy foods more affordable.
In conclusion, in society there are different people with different preferences, but the government should think about all of us and taking everyone’s views into consideration.