Learning and developing are the most significant factors in human lifestyle. In contemporary times, several people believe that elderlies have to be fully educated untill they reach leagal age. I partially agree with the view that learning is required till 18 years old.
Can people learn when their aging? Or why educating have crucial infulence to society? The young community consciously had more time for learning and developing; in fact, these people would barely experience responsibility in their life. In this case, they can fully concentrate studying improving and most importantly contributing to society. For instance, people between 8 and 18, can learn novel instrument for playing, study new language for speaking, and enroll in art courses to be an artist; this can be possible when they have no responsibility and have a long time for educating and realizing their inner skill. Furthermore, biologically the brain is ready for adding an improving knowledges and novel subjects; on the other hand, their brain is like as dough and can be shaped with vary pressures, and these pressures also are the education and subjects in real life.
Does this education adequate for society? In fact., education is not the only factor for learning; because, teenagers have to be met with society, and education alongside socialization can crucially influence younger life. Moreover, educating in single way cannot improve, but also contribute to mental issues continuously. For instance, while student only contribute to study, they can slightly forget the socializing, and they become a stressful, accuracy, and suffering from some mental issues, such as neurological issues.
In conclusion, people believe that young community have a significant duty to study until age 18, while me personally, believe that, the irresponsibility, more time alongside open brains for studying can partially influence younger life because, social experience in their life can contribute them to be more creative and impressive in the future.