Band 6+: Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With the expectation of the prisoners’ reintegration, some people argued that educating adolescents about the perils of turning to a career of crime through holding conversations with these individuals surpassess other methods. While I accept that this phenomenon might be beneficial to some extent, I would argue that there existing more feasible teaching statregies.

Admittedly, entitling criminals to impart the repercussions of wrongdoing to teenagers could play an integral role in decreasing the crime rate. Owing to receiving punishments including non-custodial sentence, incarceration, prisons who are released back into society could render realistic evidence about the reverberations of committing a crime, predisposing and shaping student’s personalities. Not only does the crime rate plummet, but also offenders are given a chance of rehabilitation. However, implementing this educational strategy might be susceptible of the risk of selecting prisoners who are devoid of repentance to educate, leading to the spreadness of aberrant ideologies which could breed future offenders.

Due to the above – mentioned menace, by no means does the implementation of this method outstrip other ways of imparting. There are several feasible solutions to this issue. For fear of the method’s countereffect, there is a need for strategy-makers to replace offenders with police. To illustrate, police could also provide insights about the crime ranging from the full weight of the law to the life behind bars. Nevertheless, unlike prisoners, police possess higher level of commitment to educate students to become law-abiding citizens. Furthermore, many teenagers regard police as an emblematic figure of justice and therefore they have a disposition to believe and adhere to the police’s guidelines, resulting in the lower crime rate. Besides, curricula at school should be a combination of moral lessons and academic training. Teachers could utilize programmes such as criminal documentaries and interviews with victims as reliable sources to educate children about the dangers of committing a crime. These videos might arouse student’s compassion, which could cease them from breaking the law.

In conclusion, although permitting prisoners to hold the conversations could do wonders for raising awareness of students, there are 2 more different steps to mitigate the issue, including the involvement of police and the innovations in the teaching strategy.