There is no denying that nowadays gadjets and artificial intelligence could replace humans and be more educated than them. Particullary, in countries, where technologies are very advanced. More of the scientists belive in this theory due to the level of international educational background alleviate dramatically. I oppose the view and my reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.
I strongly disagree with the given topic. In our century technologies has become more and more significant and disclose a considerable amount of new opportunities and real benefits. Firs of all, I want to remark that new machanics defenetely help us in every day routine. Most of people are in fallacy, thinking they don’t encount with them on a day-to-day life. However, using even artificial intelligent assist them to cope with varioty troubles. For example, in choosing the best of given options or to write a plausible speechfor work meeting or colleges lunch. It’s also worth remembering that it is used in many professional fields. Especially, in art and programming scopes of activity. At present the capabilities of advantegious technologies havesurprassed human expectations. They can create real-looking movies, support and give literate points of opinion, helps in creating variaty types of apps and web-sites.
Nevertheless, the drawbacks are equally significant. In my opinion, robots completely lack of abstract reasoning , even if they are quick on the uptake. Every person has a deep soul, thousands of different emotions and memories – it is a foundation of real personality, which machines wouldn’t have. Soul is indespensible eleborated thing that never could be replaced by the inanimate goods.
All in all, i want to say that human and robots can live in peace. However, the latter don’t available to create something that people can not. Everything thet create a person also established by person and could not be replaced by folk.