Some people consider that lawbreakers are influenced by various onerous conditions and surroundings. In contrast, the opposing viewpoints said that instinct and fundamental cognitive behavior are responsible for the crimes they commit. In my perspective, I believe that the offenders are made up of circumstances that account for this trend.
Those who argue that crime is rooted in an individual’s personality traits and moral compass indicate that certain people have a natural inclination to engage in criminal behavior due to natural characteristics. Furthermore, they are more prone to take part in unlawful acts by choice in spite of sufficient legal rights and full access to all living conditions. As an exemplification, those who commit serious crimes such as serial killers, rapists, or capital felons are notorious for their violent and sadistic tendencies, which were carried out with a sense of pleasure and lecherous ẹnjoyment.
However, notwithstanding the fact that some congenital diseases or mutations in cognitive abilities are responsible for a part of this tendency, it is from my standpoint that crime is primarily an outcome of social issues and poverty. As the primary rationale, the majority of individuals may turn to criminal behavior when they are faced with extreme oppression, financial insecurity and social inequality. These conditions lead to frustration, hopelessness, and despair, which can ultimately force them to the brink/edge/verge of giving in and becoming criminals as a means of survival. In fact, parts of New York City’s population are homeless and receive no aid from the government, and are thus lured easily by illegal drugs and substances, and criminal activities of various degrees to ensure their survival, even if it means they are at risk of severe punishments.
In conclusion, while natural tendencies are among the drivers of misdeeds, I believe the defining factor contributing to an increase in crime can still be traced back to social issues and an inherently unjust social system.