There is mo denying the fact that governments have responsibilities towards their citizens such as realizing equality and assist disadvantaged people. While it is a commonly held belief that authorities should firstly prioritize supporting their own citizens. There is also an argument that opposes it. In my opinion, I consider that it could be a suitable and essential measure to access all poor and ameliorate the nations.
To begin with, it is clear that communities have been carrying a large number of poor people which need supporting to live in equal conditions. In other words, when the government prioritizing based on poverty factor, that will enhance the situation of each household. In addition, offering supplies to this group may prevent occuring social problems. For instance, when the authority offer essential needs and requirements to this group may reduce the victims rates such as steeling.
Another point to consider, nowadays all governments have been facing difficulties to covert the public demands, and implementing social programmes for improve the social life, by staring with the important assignments will alleviate concerns on state’ shoulder. It also possible to say that due to the increasing of disasters related to climate change have carried states additional costs. Moreover, application this measure will have been reducing the disparities between both low-income families and high-income families. For example when policymakers provide state-based health service target the poor only will decrease the difference among layers’ society.
To conclude, despite people having different views. I believe that applicating this procedure globally will ameliorate the governments’ capacity and help a large segments of population whose they really need.