It is argued that scientific advancements may help to produce cheaper tons of products. Many individuals advocate this is a constructive progress, where as others believe it has a negative effect. The purpose of this essay is to analyze both sides of this argument and then I will give my own perspective.
There are merits for the improvement of producing in many measures and at lower prices. In other words, human resourses may be aimed to other spheres. Besides, citizens will have more products with available prices and it may have a positive influence to them. One good illustration of this is that we have many fabrics and manufactures with a various types of produced machines and it allow to create goods in large quantities. As a consequence, cheaper and more quantities nutrition might have a positive advantages on consumers.
However, there are also disadvantages of these changes. First of all, many people could be without there earnings and new technologies may replace them. Clearly, some manufactures may use inappropriate goods to produce in large numbers. Likewise, nowadays everything is going to be more expansive and people to save on food will buy cheaper products. The most notable example of this is that many cities have a hordes of markets where products and food with lower class and if people will use it often they would face with other problems. Hence, many people feel that these aspects of changes are detrimental.
In conclusion, I believe both sides of the argument have their merits. On balance, however, it seems that today’s technology allows saving people’s health. This is because food will be available for mostly part of society and in large numbers.