Allocating resources to young people is considered to be the key for a country to prepare for the future. While investing in young people might foster a rapid progress in learning, I strongly believe that such expenditure might act as a catalyst for inequality in a country, possibly leading to many public debates.
Proponents of investing in youngsters emphasize quick progress in learning as the main reason for their preference. Because young people possess a fresh mind, they naturally accept new knowledge and intake at a quick pace. For example, in Japan, government prefers to allocate funding to enhance curricula at a elementary school, as the authorities admit that they can formulate well-educated and innovative workforce, who can contribute to national economy down the road. As a consequence, rapid learning might equip young people with extensive base of knowledge, leading them to innovative state-of-the-art technologies, which might help a country remain competitive among other well- developed nations. If a country did not place a greater emphasis in investing in young people, it would flourish at a leisurely pace, lagging behind other nations.
I, on the other hand, believe that such investment might lead to inequality. This is because when funding is mostly directed towards young people, other age groups might regard themselves as unnecessary in a country, which might create inequality. For instance, in the USA, government invests heavily in education of young people, leading to many disputes and protests among the public who also want to receive the same amount of funding as the young. This inequality might eventually result in migration to other countries where equality take precedence. This might, as a whole, might negatively affect a country, reducing its workforce, which might hinder the development of a country in the long run. If a country strike a balance in allocating resources to the public, inequality would not exist, possibly preventing many from leaving their own nations.
In conclusion, investing in young people might promote faster learning, which might translate into technological innovations in a country, helping it stand out among other nations. However, I firmly believe that such spending might result in inequality, causing many people to leave a country, weakening its workforce in the long term.